<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cambridgedog.com">
<channel>
 <title>Cambridge DOG - General Questions</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/taxonomy/term/20/0</link>
 <description>Answers to general questions about dog parks, such as &quot;What is a dog park?&quot; or &quot;Why have off-leash space?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What is a Dog Park?</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/20</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A dog park can take one of several different forms:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A fenced area within a park
&lt;li&gt;A &quot;dog-zone&quot; within a park created by natural barriers, not fences
&lt;li&gt;Certain hours or days in a park when off-leash use is permitted, with few changes to the park&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:24:04 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So, it doesn&#039;t always mean taking over a whole park?</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/19</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No. In fact, we think &quot;dog park&quot; has been a problematic term-- people tend to think that a &quot;park&quot; will get turned into a &quot;dog park&quot; with no room left for humans. So, let&#039;s use terms like &quot;off-leash space&quot; as much as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:56:36 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Okay, I&#039;ll still have &quot;my park&quot; to go to. But I don&#039;t want to be hassled there by dogs running up to me or to my little child.</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/18</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dog owners don&#039;t want that either. We want fences around our areas, keeping our dogs away from ordinary citizens and ordinary citizens&#039; dogs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:55:41 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If being off-leash is so great, why not have dogs run free all the time?</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/16</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Because civilization involves compromises.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides, we&#039;re not talking about a wilderness experience here. We&#039;re trying to get dogs and people to live together in healthy ways. Both dogs and people need to learn how to be off-leash in good ways rather than destructive ways.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:39 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why have off-leash space? Why not keep exercising dogs while they are tethered to their owners?</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/17</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Leashes do two things of concern to dog owners: 1) they limit the dog&#039;s space and speed to human limitations, and 2) they get tangled up if two dogs are playing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To explain more:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dogs NEED exercise. An off-leash dog is free to sprint and leap at will --- for many dogs, this means a level of exercise that humans just can&#039;t keep up with. The cardiovascular effect is great for the dog&#039;s longevity and weight control, and the overall effect (endorphins? who knows?) makes most dogs calmer and better behaved at home. Neurotic activities such as destructive chewing, nuisance barking, separation anxiety, and overall obnoxiousness are definitely reduced by regular, intensive exercise. Ask any dog owner or trainer. These effects are so well known that they hardly need further proof.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:55:12 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why are the proposed dog parks equipped with fences? Off-leash is about freedom, why limit it?</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/15</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There are a few dog owners who want the run of things, but most dog owners realize that fences are to everybody&#039;s benefit. They keep dogs from getting smushed by cars, and keep owners from the ire of parents and others.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/safety">Safety Issues</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:30:06 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Isn&#039;t the publicity about dog parks threatening the freedom we now have to take our dogs off-leash?</title>
 <link>http://www.cambridgedog.com/node/9</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Some dog owners have argued that while it&#039;s against the law, we do it now with relative impunity. Let&#039;s not rock the boat and increase enforcement or fines. But the fact of the matter is that complaints have already been lodged by our neighbors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.cambridgedog.com/faq/dogpark/general">General Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:48:26 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
